The lines between intellectual property IP and IQ are becoming increasingly blurred with the rise of AI, widespread plagiarism, and open source. A few years ago, I adopted the concept of inquiry-based learning, which was the approach I used to create all my articles on Forbes.
Today, this has evolved into modern-day prompt engineering with the help of your favorite AI. Soon, the quality of your work will be determined by the choices and the elegance of your logic code.
The quality of a 'body of work', particularly in the context of the modern-day technologies, is still characterized by its timelessness across space and time - 2D,3D,4D & 5D.
This timelessness is achieved when the work remains relevant, accurate, and valuable regardless of cultural, technological, or societal changes. It is determined by the choices and elegance of logic code in the following ways:
Adaptability: The work should be flexible enough to adapt to various contexts and scenarios.
Robustness: The work should be able to handle a wide range of inputs and generate accurate and relevant outputs.
Scalability: The work should be able to handle an increasing volume and variety of inputs without compromising its quality.
Efficiency: The work should be able to generate outputs in a timely and efficient manner.
Elegance: The work should be aesthetically pleasing and easy to understand.
In my article about the Ontological Economy, I discussed the movement towards a 5D collective consciousness, which is clearly mirrored in our cultural perception. This transformation is best grasped and evaluated using numerical probabilities and logical sequences. As they gamify the representation of most human endeavors.
Analysts in an AI world may not even exist at all. Information moves fast, and is competed away. With over 40,000 CFAs a year coming why do they all all Underperform no edge in data? I start to think it's all EQ and fighting the fade and weighing into neglect when others don't. Nice piece you have written